A wisecracking, indecisive advertising executive. An assistant high school American football coach. His Villainous Breakdownunlike 10's racist diatribe, is not met with the disgust or contempt of the other jurors.
An angry Juror 3 accuses Juror 5, who grew up in a slum, of changing his vote out of sympathy towards slum children.
Their characters speak for them. He has preconceived notions about the case. The tension of the characters draws the audience in from the start. Or was he reprising Henry Fonda's role in 12 Angry Men.
Jurors 3, 4 and His final act in the play before the end and final vote. I started watching this film on a bored relaxed laying about day but by the end i was on the edge of the seat with my hands on my knees feeling more tense than a politician on results day.
Maybe you can still smell it on me. To 8, though more like a Jerkass Counterpart; they're both men of passion unwilling to back down when they believe their cause is just. Juror 3 - probably the most complex personality in the film.
He is the fifth to vote "not guilty"; played by John Fiedler. You know where you stand with an authentic leader as they openly express their thoughts and feelings In the movie, Davies is very honest and transparent about his position. Juror 1 - a simple man who clearly does not understand the full complexity of the task that lies before him but is trying to do everything not to let anyone else find this out.
Obviously, one would be angry and upset. Very hard, to make the camera human. Or is the judge rewriting history. Instead of following the trial itself, the viewer has a unique chance to observe the events behind the closed doors of a jury room.
Before showing the movie, tell the class that the film shows a realistic view of jury deliberations. Part of his jerkass demeanour is that he responds to arguments with deeply sarcastic wisecracks. Do we have a filmmaker today who could do this. His background lets him refute the evidence of the defendant's much taller father having a downward stab wound, something only possible with such a grip, as he knows no experienced switchblade user would do it.
Juror 11 - an immigrant watchmaker, careful methodical man, well mannered and soft spoken. Almost the entire film takes place in just one room, the jury room, where the men have retired to consider their verdict.
This is one of those movies where everything could go wrong. The story is as simple as it can be: 12 men are jurors on a open and shut murder trial, but one man thinks that another persons life deserves at least some thought on the matter and votes not guilty.
() Henry Fonda stars in Sidney Lumet's classic legal drama. A man tries to persuade his fellow jurors that a young man didn't murder his father.
A Puerto Rican youth is on trial for murder, accused of knifing his father to death. The twelve jurors retire to the jury room, having been admonished that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable holidaysanantonio.com: $ 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Essay.
Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. Jul 29, · Watch video · The plot of12 Angry Men revolves around the murder trail of a Latino boy who is accused of killing his father.
The conviction of the boy would mean a death sentence and the destiny of the boy's life is in the hands of twelve male jurors of ranging personalities/10(K).
Twelve Angry Men succeeds on a number of levels. First, it serves as an excellent lesson in civics. In particular, it illustrates the application of the Seventh Amendment, a component of the .12 angry men jurors 4 and